“If you train your mind and pay attention to it, it has the potential to be a sovereign playground for you that’s isolated, safe, private, and maybe all-powerful. You’re the only one who can set foot there and enjoy the freedom it gives you.”

Preface

The human mind has the potential to be a very powerful force but, unfortunately, I think that most of us don’t realize this. The ancient stoics realized this. For example, Marcus Aurelius, Epictetus and Seneca all spoke about the power of the human mind:

• “It’s not what happens to you, but how you react to it that matters.” – Epictetus
• “A man is as unhappy as he has convinced himself he is.” – Seneca
• “External things are not the problem. It’s your assessment of them. Which you can erase right now. If the problem is something in your own character, who’s stopping you from setting your mind straight?” – Marcus Aurelius

This tree isn’t going to delve deep into the human mind because that’s something profoundly complex and a lifelong subject matter at that. Also, it’s not even fully understood. However, I’m going to briefly talk about a mental model I came up with during my summer vacation this year that has actually helped me push through physical and mental training.

Impetus

In all honesty, this year has been a rough one for me mentally because I lost my 24-year-old brother to drugs. Writing is something that alleviates my stress, so I wrote about it, and so the tree of CONVICTION was born. It’s often said that time heals, but I think it would be more accurate to say that time changes the pain. If the pain never truly goes away, neither do the symptoms.

What has been the current symptom for me? Every single day I do something (e.g., an activity), I either visualize and see my brother alongside me and/or I think about all the lost opportunities. I go to the gym and I see my brother training beside me. I go grocery shopping and I see my brother with me. The list of things I could’ve done with my brother goes on and on… This “habit” hasn’t been inherently a pleasant one, and so I’ve started to smile and laugh because, had I not, I would’ve shed tears.¹

So, one evening, when reading about hypnosis and trance, I thought more about this (mental) symptom and did some introspection because I wanted to ensure that this “symptom” is at least a benign one. In programming, there’s a technique known as abstraction. That term is something that every newcomer will hear sooner or later. If you think about it, our mind is filled with abstractions. I decided to pay more attention to my abstracted thoughts, and basically, in my mind, I created a dichotomy of positive and negative feelings.

Introspection helps because when you examine and observe your own mind, you’ll start to notice various inner elements. When you feel negative (e.g., anxious, fearful, sad, helpless, inadequate, etc.), focus inward and really feel that negativeness as an abstraction in your mind. Don’t escape the feeling but embrace it and sense it. Do the same for positive emotions. If you train your mind and pay attention to it, it has the potential to be a sovereign playground for you that’s isolated, safe, private, and maybe all-powerful.² You’re the only one who can set foot there and enjoy the freedom it gives you.

Mental Model

While I was in the gym training, I had an eureka moment. Due to their nature, abstractions aren’t effective for cultivating understanding. For maximum understanding, abstractions should be turned into concrete representations. So, in my mind, I decided to create concrete representations of those abstracted positive and negative feelings, and I came up with the model called “Sphere vs. Stellated Dodecahedron”.

So, this might sound peculiar, but what I try to do is reduce the amount of abstracted feelings in my mind via imagination by imagining I’m using clay and molding them into concrete visualized representations:

1. Each positive feeling represents a sphere as they’re simpler, safer, and more productive. There’s a reason balls are used in many sports.
2. Each negative feeling represents a stellated dodecahedron as they’re complex, dangerous, and unproductive. Imagine, if instead of a ball-shaped rock, Zeus gave Sisyphus a stellated dodecahedron to push up a hill…

If these propositions are true, then I need to make sure that there are more spheres than stellated dodecahedra in the temple of my mind.³ For me, the procedure behind this mental model has been as follows:

1. I do introspection by focusing inward and assessing my mental status. By the way, just for fun, I think of this as a sort of mental dashboard
2. If I notice I’m feeling negative, I’ll sense this negativity as abstracted feelings.
3. In the temple of my mind, by utilizing clay, I try to mold them into stellated dodecahedra.
4. Afterwards, I blunt and weaken the sharp spikes until all that’s left is a beautiful sphere. I imagine I’m squishing the ball, controlling it, and playing with it.
5. I feel as though I’m in control, as the negative feelings have no authority over me. I mold them as I please.

There might be scientific literature related to this, but I’m too lazy to do research and provide scientific evidence. What I can say, however, is that this anecdote of mine has helped me process and handle this year’s unfortunate events. I feel as though I’ve finally grasped something pivotal because, against all expectations, I’m currently the strongest I’ve ever been, both physically and mentally (let’s hope it stays that way).

Final Words

If someone wanders here and reads this, I hope that this provides some help either now or in the future. The most important thing to realize is that you have power over your mind. Even though the things in our mind are abstract, you can make them less abstract. The less abstract something is, the more understandable it is. The more understandable something is, the more you can reason about it. The more you can reason about something, the less scary and daunting it becomes. After all, we humans fear the unknown.

Footnotes

1. This is apparently called cognitive reappraisal. By forcing yourself to smile, for example, you’re “generating” a positive reinterpretation of an adverse event. Honestly, this is much better than crying or keeping a poker face. ︎
2. By paying attention I mean, for example, have intrapersonal communication (or inner speech). Many of us consume way too much external information by listening to what other people say and thinking what other people think. I’m not saying that this is inherently a bad thing but it can be because sometimes you should think for yourself. Have inner dialogue with yourself and extrapolate things using your own mind. This is related to critical thinking and, in a much broader sense, to metacognition. ︎
3. When I was playing the video game Tekken 7, I fell in love with the Infinite Azure battle stage and its theme song. The synergy between them is so good. For some reason, this stage with its song started representing my mind perfectly. There’s just something so peaceful imagining myself there, where nobody can bother me, and being truly free. A place akin to Infinite Azure is the temple of my mind (i.e., my mental sanctum). ︎

Preface

When ChatGPT, one implementation of Generative AI (GAI), was released in November 2022, it marked a new era for the age of AI in which we currently live. There’s no denying it. There’s no stopping it. Times have changed and are continuing to change whether we want it or not. All we can do is try and enjoy the rollercoaster.

However, let’s be honest, it hasn’t changed anything in the grand scheme of things. The world is still the same as it was before GAI. Sure, GAI might have been the primary cause of some layoffs, but for now, I think that the benefits outweigh the costs.

What do I mean? Well, I think that GAI has an overall positive effect on our learning if (and only if) we use it judiciously. I’ve utilized it during these couple of years and had an epiphany. Thanks to GAI, a new lifelong objective has been bestowed upon us: train to set it aside (except for feedback).

Why

GAI isn’t going anywhere, and it isn’t going to get banned, and neither should it. Figuratively speaking, it’s kind of a modern “nuclear weapon in development”. They who limit its development will lose. West limits and/or bans AI? China and Russia would win. Governments know this. And so, we come to the age-old aphorism: if you can’t beat them, join them. If you’re against AI, you will lose in the job market to the ones who use it wisely.

Additionally, ChatGPT has shown to reduce the amount of brain activity according to an MIT study. The study revolves around cognitive debt which is explained as follows: “… a condition in which repeated reliance on external systems like LLMs replaces the effortful cognitive processes required for independent thinking.“

To be honest, almost anyone capable of using common sense can come to the conclusion that using GAI reduces the amount of brain activity and hence slows the amount of neuroplasticity from happening. If I put two and two together, I can confidently say without any evidence that this won’t decrease the amount of Alzheimer’s diagnoses.

Having a competitive edge in the job market and maintaining your cognitive health should be more than enough of “why.”

How

If you’ve read the tree of Inspiration, which is one of the core trees in Karnavaara, you could presume that ChatGPT is the favorite/front-runner and you’re the underdog. But unfortunately, this might not be practical as ChatGPT is a literal machine. It’s safe to say that you’ll never be able to outwork it. But you can train to set it aside.

First and foremost, come up with stuff by using your own brain. This relates to the generation effect. Do this honestly. Only after you’re complacent with your work, send it to ChatGPT and ask for feedback. Ask questions such as “Is this accurate?”, “Have I understood this correctly?”, “how would you grade this?” etc. You should be the helmsman and ChatGPT your first mate (i.e., your mentor/teacher).

ChatGPT will probably output a lot of feedback. Take your time and dissect it. Understand the dissection. Learn the dissection. Afterwards, return and improve your work. Do NOT copy-and-paste verbatim what ChatGPT came up with. Remember that you’re training to set it aside (except for feedback). With this mindset it doesn’t make any sense to make yourself dependent on it, right?

One crucial thing to remember is that our brain isn’t weak. I think I demystified this in the tree of Diary. The amount of information our brain can store is theorized to be 2.5 million gigabytes. Our brain is capable of some unbelievable things, and not only on a theoretical level. Another thing is that there’s no rush. Take it slow. Breathe. You can read and watch videos all you want but that isn’t going to do jack shit if your memory encoding is nonexistent.

…

“Rather than wishing and aiming to be the favorite or front-runner, you should crave to be the underdog or, more specifically, have the mind of one.”

Preface

I think we’ve all had that illogical and negative feeling on some level or another when somebody other than us achieves or trumps something: feelings of insecurity or inferiority, or both. I know I’ve had it.

This somebody can be whoever, and their achievement can be whatever (something we’ve attained or not). In the end, neither of these things matters because, for some reason, our brain can perceive their accomplishment as a sort of personal attack on our equanimity, which could cause us to be bitter, among other things. Though let’s be honest, this “personal attack” is purely our delusion¹. A so-called non-sequitur probably caused because we tend to compare ourselves to others (i.e., the social comparison theory).

When this happens, you should do some mental alchemy and convert that feeling of insecurity, inferiority, or self-consciousness to inspiration. Be inspired by that somebody and strive to be even better!

This is called healthy competition, which, by the way, doesn’t have to be actual competition but something that exists solely in your mind where, instead of being the favorite, you’re the underdog.

Why

One of the reasons why we feel like this might be related to the concept of the ego. For example, when you’re a perfectionist (or preferably a high-achiever) in an environment without “healthy competition” for a long time (e.g., a couple of years), you get accustomed to it, and your ego grows unexpectedly. You might not even realize this until someone as capable (or more) as you shows up. This could damage your inflated ego because you’re not the one and only “that guy” anymore. In other words, your self-concept hasn’t been stress-tested.

The negative effects that this so-called cognitive distortion causes are neither healthy nor productive. It’s irrational. Losing your presence of mind and feeling insecure because someone has overcome weaknesses and gotten more competent signifies a weakness in your character. A man of confidence and self-assurance knows not to fret. Why would he? That other person isn’t him² and, as the stoic quote goes:

“The bravest sight in the world is to see a great man struggling against adversity.”

—Seneca

One of the most essential things to extrapolate from this quote is that when you see or hear someone struggle to overcome adversity, let it be a catalyst for inspiration and motivation and not for feelings of inferiority, bitterness, or envy.

If you succeed in this, well, you’ve just found yourself an external source that fills up your curiosity, focus, and commitment tanks like no other. And, for me, it’s one hell of a source because it’s actually the number one coefficient in my burnout resistance.

In this healthy competition, rather than wishing and aiming to be the favorite or front-runner, you should crave to be the underdog or, more specifically, have the mind of one.

1. Nobody’s watching out for the underdog.
2. All the odds are against the underdog.
3. Failures cost the underdog less than they do for the favorite.
4. The underdog can experiment more and play risky.
5. The underdog gets burnt out at a slower rate.
6. The underdog can watch and learn from the favorite.
7. The underdog has a measurable, concrete, and practical growth goal: get even with or surpass the favorite.

How

In all honesty, I can’t say for certain because the ego is very complex, even for psychologists. I don’t know of any blueprint with practical steps to balance and cure it. What I can do, however, is postulate that deliberately having the mindset of an underdog leads to a stance that could both resist ego inflation and deflate it and lead to a better performance.

Here’s how you should internally react:

1. Don’t tie your self-worth to being number one because a single better performer can crash it.
   Underdogs are never mentally number one.
2. When someone overcomes adversity and attains something and/or outperforms you, and you start feeling that irrational self-doubt, envy, or insecurity creep up, smile and thank them in your mind³. This minimizes zero-sum thinking, which is a common fallacy.
   Underdogs always have something to gain when someone else succeeds. Any envy is benign.
3. Don’t be the “smartest guy in the room.” You don’t know absolute smartness until you’ve seen/heard it with your own eyes/ears.
   Underdogs always aim to be in rooms where they are, well, the underdogs.
4. Remember that when another person overcomes an obstacle, they have probably suffered on some level. It doesn’t matter if they suffered less, as much, or more than you.
   Underdogs see the beauty in voluntary suffering to overcome adversity, which naturally commands both inspiration and motivation.
5. Listen, watch, and learn. When someone “shocks” you with their work, don’t dismiss it mentally. Be curious and perspicacious. Find out how they came up with their work, what techniques they utilized, and, most importantly of them all, try to understand their work on both a practical and theoretical level⁴.
   Underdogs never let new knowledge be filtered out through their egos. Admirable brilliance fuels their curiosity. They pull out the mechanisms (practicality) from the idea (abstraction).

These are just some of the “tenets” off the top of my mind I’ve learned during my journey. I’ll add more when they manifest themselves to me.

Conclusion

In the end, this might boil down to one of those just-do-it kind of things when someone shocks your self-concept or ego: just be positively inspired instead of negatively affected⁵. But this was too abstract, so I thought of a more concrete model: be the underdog. I believe this is a beneficial concrete/practical response to the irrational and unhealthy “sting” someone unintentionally causes.

So, the next time you feel that sting, smile and be thankful because that sting should remind you that you’re the underdog.

Lastly, let me be clear: being the underdog doesn’t mean you can’t be a competent expert. It doesn’t mean you exhibit learned helplessness. The cold hard fact is that we’re all underdogs in the end. There’s always somebody more skilled than us. Somebody who’s absolutely smarter and wiser than us. If we’re all underdogs in position, why not adopt the healthy identity of an underdog? After all, as Socrates said:

“The only thing I know is that I know nothing.”

Footnotes

1. This is somewhat similar to some people’s “people are watching my every move” delusion. Let’s be honest; it’s highly probable that nobody is paying attention to you in the gym or supermarket. ︎
2. This reminds me of jealousy. Every time someone speaks about being jealous or at the very least seems to be jealous, I blurt out: “Why would you be jealous to someone who isn’t you?” ︎
3. Even better, you could tell them that they did a good job! Although, this one is up to you because I know how annoying and disrespectful it is to say “good job” to someone and not receive even a small “thank you” back… ︎
4. Depending on the size and complexity of their work, this might be a lifelong herculean task. So, for practicality, aim to gain at least an understanding on a practical level because it can inform theory. ︎
5. This is closely related to the stoic principle known as “Power Over Your Mind”, which comes from Marcus Aurelius’ book of Meditations (Book Eight, Section 47): “External things are not the problem. It’s your assessment of them. Which you can erase right now. If the problem is something in your own character, who’s stopping you from setting your mind straight?” ︎

“To honestly believe in something is to be ready to accept the consequences of what said belief has put on you.”

You know what’s weird? All it takes is one sight: green grass. It’s such an insignificant and self-evident thing… But it floods me with memories, such as the one time we were grilling outside with our mom. We were all smiling, laughing, making jokes, and having fun. The weather was perfect. The grass was green. Dogs were playing and barking. I think we also played football that day. Trying to create memories as a family should. Trying to fix a broken family bond. Ah… It’s just so painful and sad because I know… I know that from now on until the end of my time, there won’t ever be days like that, and the wish I had where you’d stand alongside me is now snuffed out…

While returning home from a tragedy, I talked with a random passenger. She said one thing that only Alzheimer’s can make me forget: “Mut sä pärjäät, vai mitä?” This Finnish sentence translates to “But you’ll manage, right?“

This truly serendipitous event stuck a cord because from the very start, for some reason or another, I have managed. Luck always plays a role, but it isn’t purely because of me I managed. It’s because of you I managed. Because of you, I managed because I wanted to be a beacon of hope.

I watched you. I saw the things you were doing. You did good things but, to be honest, they weren’t all wise decisions. You weren’t always the best decision-maker, but who is? I’m not. You showed me, not in theory but in practice, what I should watch out for. You told me indirectly what I shouldn’t do and what I should do.

I tried to do the same for you–to create a sort of healthy feedback loop. I tried to show you that you don’t need many friends: only a few good ones will do. I tried to show you that true freedom comes from within: there’s no need to rely on extrinsic factors. I tried to show you that it’s okay to be lonely sometimes: detach from others and have self-dialogue. I tried to show you that you don’t need to preach or show your achievements to others: don’t seek validation from others, and most importantly, prove these to yourself. Courtesy of you, I also tried to show this all in practice, not theory.

However, where I failed as your brother was to show you what it really means to live life and what life is really about. I didn’t try to illustrate that to you, and now it truly pains me to know it’s too late. I should have told you–no, shown you how–to stay alive because as long as you’re alive, there’s potential, as you always have a second (or nth) chance.

So, from the bottom of my heart, thank you for this all, Jami. Thank you for being part of my life. I am who I am in a big part because of you. I mirror the potential you would’ve had. And now, because of you, I think I’ll finally get to know what conviction really means and, as usual, not in theory but in practice. I won’t let this opportunity pass.

So, gears will be switched. I see no other way than to try and alchemize this into something great.

A straight and narrow road? Bedridden with difficulties? Includes events of despair and setback? A required determination level of “come hell or high water“? Brilliant! I’ll journey on one of those, though this time, I know how to walk and navigate while doing my utmost to practice what I preach.

Each of us has a fire that slowly but surely burns and fizzles out. Afterward, only pure white ash remains. But, before the fire fizzles out, there will be a brief but crucial time window where it should burn the brightest. This is the time when something exceptional and remarkable is brought into the spotlight. Life is, after all, impermanent.

I believe this is what you’d have wanted. For us, life was never meant to be conventional. Thank you for finally demystifying this to me. After all, no man is truly self-made.

You’re both the reason I took this path and stayed on it: I wanted to show you that we have hope. And now, you’re why I’ll stay on this path with conviction. It isn’t always the big brother who sets an example.

Everything I have done and will do is something you could’ve done. If only the circumstances were better… I see now that to honestly believe in something is to be ready to accept the consequences of what said belief has put on you.

If the untimely death of your own little brother doesn’t command growth, what does? So, from now on until the day God fizzles my fire and I die, this is my true conviction. Be my shadow, Jami, and witness everything.

“He who has a why to live can bear almost any how.”

—Nietzsche

Teot puhuu enemmän kuin sanat, vai mitä, Jami? Lepää rauhassa. Kiitos, kun olit osa mun elämää 31.5.2000 – 15.2.2025. Niissä olosuhteissa, jotka elämä soi meille, ei oo mitään permutaatiota jossa olisin yksin pärjännyt. Sä pidit mulle seuraa.

“…autodidacticism is pure, unadulterated freedom augmented with a positively reinforcing feedback loop: knowledge is power, and with power, you can enforce freedom.“

Preface

You have probably heard of this before, but did you know that each of us has a unique art or discipline that we are best suited to master, and only God knows what it is? We must discover this so called vocation ourselves because no survey, examination, or research can find it for us. How do we discover it? What’s the most effective way? Well, for starters, I think we should self-direct our learning and be autodidacts.

Study because you want to study. Study what you want to study. Study how you want to study. Don’t force yourself to study something you don’t want to–it’s an infringement and a disservice to your autonomy and freedom. Instead, nurture a sense of reactance–resist things that reduce your educational freedom–and it’ll be only a matter of time until you carve your path while developing your passions, leading to self-actualization.

Why

Well, why would you let somebody else control your education? Why would you want to be bound by formal structures or authority figures like teachers? Why would you want to be in courses led by teachers who tell you what to study, imply how to study, and force you to do homework they come up with, which you probably don’t want to do?

Maybe I’m exaggerating and generalizing a bit, but let’s be honest: school cultivates a culture of (in most situations) poor, forced, and other-than-self-directed learning.

1. What if the teacher is subpar? What if you notice that but want to avoid bringing it up just in case you become singled out as a target for negative attention?
2. What if the courses and their materials are outdated and weak?
3. What if politics have corrupted the course?
4. What if the homework (at least in the bigger picture) could be more interesting or varied?
5. What if you deem the way that the school works detrimental? What if this modus operandi forces you to carry out unnecessary boilerplate?
6. Should the classroom atmosphere be hazardous? What then?
7. What about learned helplessness (which is most prevalent in mathematics)? Your ability to help yourself might become dependent on the teacher.
8. Are you a fan of teaching to the test? Yeah, me neither.

Don’t get me wrong, school definitely has its benefits, but to me, the downsides outweigh them. I never really¹ succeeded or thrived in school, and because of that, I felt I was inferior to everybody else. I don’t particularly appreciate being told what, how, and why to study. I study because I want to study, and I study what I want to study. Nobody can tell me otherwise because nobody knows me better than me. This autodidacticism is pure, unadulterated freedom augmented with a positively reinforcing feedback loop: knowledge is power, and with power, you can enforce freedom. And, quite frankly, that’s epic.

I’ve also noticed that anything less leads to an adverse psychological reaction called reactance, which, for me, is a significant cause of procrastination. Systems, organizations, or people who tell me what to do triggers something deep in my brain that makes me actively want to fight back. This resistance is usually weak, but it’s much more powerful when it comes to learning and education. I believe there are two reasons for this:

1. I want to keep the reason for learning intrinsic and not extrinsic.
2. Learning something purely because someone told you to goes against my philosophy of studying corrupting and degrading it.

This psychological reactance resistance is so formidable that not even a monetary or non-monetary reward can’t quell it (of course, ultimately, everything has a price). Learning is fun and meaningful only when done autonomously, freely, and of your own accord.

How: Be An Autodidact

Take control of your education. Be an autodidact who is (or wants to be) self-taught. Be a lifelong learner with a preference for an unstructured education. Thrive in environments where you have the freedom to explore, experiment, and follow your passions rather than adhering to rigid educational or organizational structures. If you don’t want to learn something, don’t. If you want to learn something, learn that something. You will start to lose your way when you start learning something due to any kind of enforcement. What will happen when there is no enforcement? Exactly.

The practical application of this philosophy is quite simple: follow your heart. You don’t have to think about it logically when it comes to learning. People often choose something they want to learn only to start over-analyzing² and questioning their decision. Is this relevant? Will AI replace this? How much is the salary? Is this possible for me? Can I master this in a week? Are there any certifications? And so on.

In most cases³, these questions are irrelevant because the most detrimental thing you can do is postpone learning. On top of that, you start to think about learning extrinsically. For once, choose what to learn through the lens of pathos–your own emotion.

1. To be honest, I did get good grades in university of applied sciences later on in my studies but it was way too easy and unrewarding compared to high school. I also felt like I didn’t learn anything useful… ︎
2. This can lead to analysis paralysis, where overthinking leads to a standstill in thought. Pro tip: the small batches principle can be an antidote to analysis paralysis because it reduces the number of variables and permutations. ︎
3. I say in most cases because certain situations might require structured learning and the use of logos (i.e., think logically). For example, professional certificates or career-specific skills. However, in the latter, I still recommend skills that you personally find enjoyable. Or you can risk starting to hate your job. ︎

“Those who cannot eternalize knowledge are condemned to repeat it.”

—Karnavaara

Basis

As π (pi) has an infinite amount of numbers, comparably, the world has a boundless amount of insight. You might say, “Yeah, but in practice and not in theory. In theory, insight has a limit, but π does not.” But is it really so? Isn’t π in and of itself insight? And if π is insight, doesn’t that mean that insight is infinite? Every time you learn the next digit of π, you will notice that it does not end there. It’s the same for learning. As the universe is constantly expanding, so is insight. This information overload introduces entropy in our memories.

Consequently, what benefit do you have of knowledge if it is ephemeral? If remembering numbers of π is your job or your raison d’être, what happens when you forget them? The answer to that question can be found in the famous quote by George Santayana:

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

I wholeheartedly agree, of course. However, to be more aligned here at Karnavaara, I’ll rephrase this:

“Those who cannot eternalize knowledge are condemned to repeat it.”

Eternalizing Knowledge

Unquestionably, it is about more than how much insight you have. It’s about how well you can retain it. How well can you convert ephemerality to eternality? We can reduce the entropy in our memories in many ways (e.g., by organizing), but it all starts from the foundation: memory retention. There would not be any organizing if you can’t remember concepts or terms, right?

Imagine if Akira Haraguchi, the Japanese man holding a world record (albeit unofficial) for memorizing 100,000 digits of π, forgets even one digit along the way. He must go back and relearn it. To enhance recalling, he uses memorization techniques such as his renowned mnemonic system, where he creates stories and links them to the digits. Isn’t writing similar? We write, and in the process, we unknowingly connect the writing to our memories.

In essence, we are writing our memories.

Therefore, one of the best ways to retain the insight you have accumulated is by writing. To be more concrete, keep a diary or an engineering daybook. I discovered this from reading the book Pragmatic Programmer, 20th Anniversary Edition by David Thomas and Andrew Hunt. I highly recommend the book for anyone wanting to be more pragmatic. They didn’t exactly word it this way, but the premise is the same: jot down anything of interest you want to eternalize to keep it from being ephemeral.

Raison D’être

For this reason, every branch under this tree depicts a diary filled with insight, sometimes brimfully. The be-all and end-all of the tree of Diary’s plantation: to resist letting insight slip by and neglecting other trees and branches of the Forested Hill of Insight. Here, entropy is like a parasitic plant, and the tree of Diary is the prevention (_{^{I have yet to find a cure}}).

On the hill, we will encounter many points of no return where turning back is not an option. The further we climb, the faster we might lose our way. When this happens, stop and take a moment to look behind you. See the trees and their branches and remember where you’ve come from. All you’ve learned—everything you’ve experienced. In doing so, you won’t forget who you are.

Supplementary

These are additional resources to delve into if you so desire. Retaining knowledge is but one benefit of writing. There are many more:

• Benefits of Journaling by Hayley Phelan
• Writing to Heal by Bridget Murray
• Simple Activities Like Journaling May Reduce Risk of Dementia by Shawn Radcliffe
• The Brain-Based Benefits of Writing for Math and Science Learning by Judy Willis
• 10 Benefits That Writing Gives You by Francisco Sáez

“It’s easy to climb a hill with trees, right? Nature keeps you company and gives you shelter. But what happens when the trees end?”

Reason

My name is Jesse, and this is my personal, well, let’s say, hub of knowledge. This hub is mainly for me, though it never hurts to have another pair of eyes take a peek at your insights. Please make yourself feel at home.

What’s my main goal here? Well, to be starkly gritty, it’s to survive. My last name, Karnavaara, doesn’t really mean anything apart from “vaara”, which is equivalent to danger or risk. To survive danger (or risks), you must be prepared and lucky. It’s exactly like this famous quote:

“Luck Is What Happens When Preparation Meets Opportunity.”

—SENECA

Seneca had it right. You could wait for luck to happen reactively, or you could proactively prepare for it, all the while honing your skills. And, when luck finally does happen, its scale will be astronomical. But remember, luck can be both good and bad. You shouldn’t only prepare for the good luck, but the bad. This is where the word “danger” comes back into play, and it’s why I created my own meaning (although very abstract) for my last name: Forested Hill of Insight.

From Abstract to Concrete

Although abstract, it’s very pertinent. The hill depicts my life: I want to need to keep climbing. It being forested means it’s filled with trees that together form a forest. Of insight describes the hill with the trees as related to some understanding or knowledge. Indeed, without trees, the hill wouldn’t be of insight. It needs to be forested.

It’s easy to climb a hill ^(life) with trees ^(insight), right? Nature keeps you company and shelters you. But what happens when the trees end? You don’t let them. Someway, you have to keep sowing the seeds of insight and reaping knowledge. If you don’t, the Forested Hill of Insight will wither. And if it does, how are you prepared for the luck (be it bad or good) to come?

For me, it’s (purposefully) personal; I can’t let Karnavaara die. And so, consequently, this place of storing knowledge and diaries was born. But remember, there’s a forest akin to Karnavaara inside each of us. Your forest might look entirely different from mine: the trees and their bark, the diverse ecosystems, and the colors might all differ. But it’s still a forest nonetheless, and you’re its keeper. You make up its legacy, and the forest makes yours.